Saturday, March 23, 2019

Choice vs Equity: A Personal Response to Tomorrows' Schools Review


While there are a lot of questions around some detail and some implementation wonderings, it’s important to look at the Tomorrow’s Schools Review Report through the lens of what opportunities it may be making possible.

I have started looking at what I believe are the principles evident in its recommendations to see if they resonate with me. I have identified the following:
      Collaboration
      Collective Responsibility
      Shared Accountability
      Partnership (Te Tiriti)
      Efficiency

I have been quite surprised to see the response from some to “Say no to the Haque Plan”. First of all, it is not the Haque Plan, rather it is the Tomorrow’s Schools Review Report and should be referred to as such.

Secondly, it contains many recommendations falling under 8 key issues, making it very difficult to give the whole report a blanket ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. Anyone with an open-minded approach would find favour with some of the recommendations, would be unsure about some and would want to explore further, and would be quite opposed to others. A consultation process allows such a range of responses to be submitted and considered.

The Community Schools Alliance has been formed to Say No To The Haque Plan. A brochure that group has produced and circulated to principals to encourage them to “sign up” contains claims that must be challenged as they can be described as inaccurate, misleading or plain false:

      Schools will no longer be community-led.
      Myth: Boards of Trustees will be replaced by education “Hubs” appointed in Wellington
      Fact: Hubs will take over administration tasks currently carried out by Boards, leaving Boards to concentrate on strategic planning, school culture, student wellbeing and success, localised curriculum and assessment  practice.
      Boards of Trustees will lose all governance responsibilities
      Myth: Hubs will directly employ principals and teachers
      Fact:  Boards will be involved in the appointment of their principal and have a veto over any decision made by the Hub.
      Fact: Principals will have full control of their staffing appointments and appoint their own teachers (FAQs, Review Report p2)
      Myth: Hubs will decide the culture and approach of each school
      Fact: Boards will still determine the culture, character and nature of their school
      Fact: Boards will focus on learning and teaching decisions for their schools
      Students may not be able to attend their local school
      Myth: Hubs will control enrolment processes
      Fact: “Children and young people will have a right to attend their local school” (FAQs, Review Report p3)
      Principals will be shifted around schools every 5 years
      Fact: Principals will be appointed on 5 year contracts and will have rights of renewal. Principals would not be forced to shift.
      School structures will change dramatically
      Myth: All current high schools will be replaced with an “American” model of Senior and Middle schools
      Fact: Intermediates will be phased out in the long term and the the proposed model could be:
      Primary schools (years 1 - 6), middle schools (years 7 - 10), and senior college (years 11 - 13)
      OR full primary schools (years 1 - 8) and secondary schools (years 9 - 13)
      OR composite (Y1 - 13) schools, particularly in rural areas
      Teachers could be shifted around schools on a whim
      Fact: Principals will have full control of their staffing entitlements and appoint their own teachers
      Parents lose choices
      Myth: The Plan discourages schools from focusing on different approaches that give parents options for their children’s education
      Fact: Boards “will focus on learning and teaching decisions for their schools which directly affects the welfare of students, localised curriculum and assessment, student success and wellbeing” (FAQs, Review Report p2)
      Schools will have less control over their finances
      Fact: Principals will control and have full discretion of the use of their operational grants (FAQs: Review Report p2)
      Fact: Boards will have full control of all locally raised funds (FAQs, Review Report p1)

My wish is that we explore the report’s recommendations in an open manner so that we can strengthen the system to support all schools to be successful. In my mind it comes down to whether we support a winners/losers school model which has principals concentrating only on maximising their own school or a model which is based on the principles of collective responsibility and shared accountability.

On my deathbed I don't want to remember or be remembered for dying in the ditch for the right or value of Choice. I'd rather die in the ditch for Equity.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Thanks for this Maurie-really useful.

Can you please clarify the points about principal contracts. You mentioned that folks would have a right to renew contracts after 5 years. I was under the impression that a strength of this proposal was that hubs could move principles around in order to increase equity by ensuring the most appropriate school leaders are in place.

Is this not the case?

Muni International School Surat said...

Mis Surat School is Best Best English Medium School In Gujarat. This School Is Provided a Best Boarding School In Surat Gujarat Services.

rahul said...

Thanks For Sharing Great Post. I really appreciate it. Keep it up.
Best School in Gujarat