While there are a lot of questions around some
detail and some implementation wonderings, it’s important to look at the
Tomorrow’s Schools Review Report through the lens of what opportunities it may
be making possible.
I have started looking at what I believe are
the principles evident in its recommendations to see if they resonate with me.
I have identified the following:
●
Collaboration
●
Collective Responsibility
●
Shared Accountability
●
Partnership (Te Tiriti)
●
Efficiency
I have been quite surprised to see the
response from some to “Say no to the
Haque Plan”. First of all, it is not the Haque Plan, rather it is the
Tomorrow’s Schools Review Report and should be referred to as such.
Secondly, it contains many recommendations
falling under 8 key issues, making it very difficult to give the whole report a
blanket ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. Anyone with an open-minded approach would find favour
with some of the recommendations, would be unsure about some and would want to
explore further, and would be quite opposed to others. A consultation process
allows such a range of responses to be submitted and considered.
The Community Schools Alliance has been formed
to Say No To The Haque Plan. A
brochure that group has produced and circulated to principals to encourage them
to “sign up” contains claims that must be challenged as they can be described
as inaccurate, misleading or plain false:
●
Schools will no longer be community-led.
○
Myth: Boards of Trustees will be replaced by
education “Hubs” appointed in Wellington
○
Fact: Hubs will take over administration tasks
currently carried out by Boards, leaving Boards to concentrate on strategic
planning, school culture, student wellbeing and success, localised curriculum
and assessment practice.
●
Boards of Trustees will lose all governance responsibilities
○
Myth: Hubs will directly employ principals and
teachers
○
Fact: Boards will be involved in the appointment of
their principal and have a veto over any decision made by the Hub.
○
Fact: Principals will have full control of
their staffing appointments and appoint their own teachers (FAQs, Review Report
p2)
○
Myth: Hubs will decide the culture and
approach of each school
○
Fact: Boards will still determine the culture,
character and nature of their school
○
Fact: Boards will focus on learning and teaching
decisions for their schools
●
Students may not be able to attend their local school
○
Myth: Hubs will control enrolment processes
○
Fact: “Children and young people will have a
right to attend their local school” (FAQs, Review Report p3)
●
Principals will be shifted around schools every 5 years
○
Fact: Principals will be appointed on 5 year
contracts and will have rights of renewal. Principals
would not be forced to shift.
●
School structures will change dramatically
○
Myth: All current high schools will be
replaced with an “American” model of Senior and Middle schools
○
Fact: Intermediates will be phased out in the
long term and the the proposed model could be:
■ Primary schools (years 1 - 6), middle schools (years 7 - 10), and
senior college (years 11 - 13)
■ OR full primary schools (years 1 - 8) and secondary schools (years 9 -
13)
■ OR composite (Y1 - 13) schools, particularly in rural areas
●
Teachers could be shifted around schools on a whim
○
Fact: Principals will have full control of
their staffing entitlements and appoint their own teachers
●
Parents lose choices
○
Myth: The Plan discourages schools from
focusing on different approaches that give parents options for their children’s
education
○
Fact: Boards “will focus on learning and
teaching decisions for their schools which directly affects the welfare of
students, localised curriculum and assessment, student success and wellbeing”
(FAQs, Review Report p2)
●
Schools will have less control over their finances
○
Fact: Principals will control and have full
discretion of the use of their operational grants (FAQs: Review Report p2)
○
Fact: Boards will have full control of all
locally raised funds (FAQs, Review Report p1)
My wish is that we explore the report’s
recommendations in an open manner so that we can strengthen the system to
support all schools to be successful. In my mind it comes down to whether we
support a winners/losers school model which has principals concentrating only
on maximising their own school or a model which is based on the principles of collective responsibility and shared accountability.
On my deathbed I don't want to remember or be remembered for dying in the ditch for the right or value of Choice. I'd rather die in the ditch for Equity.
On my deathbed I don't want to remember or be remembered for dying in the ditch for the right or value of Choice. I'd rather die in the ditch for Equity.
3 comments:
Thanks for this Maurie-really useful.
Can you please clarify the points about principal contracts. You mentioned that folks would have a right to renew contracts after 5 years. I was under the impression that a strength of this proposal was that hubs could move principles around in order to increase equity by ensuring the most appropriate school leaders are in place.
Is this not the case?
Mis Surat School is Best Best English Medium School In Gujarat. This School Is Provided a Best Boarding School In Surat Gujarat Services.
Thanks For Sharing Great Post. I really appreciate it. Keep it up.
Best School in Gujarat
Post a Comment